Republicans pour money into dozens of House seats once seen as safe ahead of Nov. 3 midterms
Republicans have begun spending in at least 39 U.S. House races where they had not previously deployed major money this cycle, after internal polling showed traditionally safe seats could be vulnerable on Nov. 3, Reuters reported Sunday. Party operatives described the push as an "insurance policy" against voter anger over President Trump's policies.
AI-assisted · US Brief desk · Sources listed below
What happened
Republicans are pouring money into more than three dozen U.S. House races previously treated as safe after internal polling showed they could be vulnerable in the Nov. 3 midterm election, three Republican operatives familiar with the party's thinking told Reuters on Sunday.
Since Sep 1, major Republican groups and megadonors have begun spending in at least 39 congressional races where they had not previously deployed money this cycle, a Reuters review of spending by some of the largest Republican political groups found. Many of those candidates still lead in public polls and sit in districts President Donald Trump won by double digits in 2024 — a sign, the operatives said, of rising worry that voters will use the midterms to air dissatisfaction with Trump's policies.
House math: Republicans currently hold a narrow 218–214 majority in the House, with one independent caucusing with Republicans and two vacancies, Reuters reported. Democrats would need to net at least four seats to take control next year. House Republican leaders recently warned dozens of campaigns that internal data shows they cannot assume victory even when ahead in public polls, two of the people said.
Why it matters
Operatives described the deployments as "insurance policies" to keep Republican-held districts in the party's hands amid economic strain — rising gas, energy, and fertilizer costs — that one House campaign aide called "dire" in Midwest agricultural states. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Viet Shelton told Reuters Republicans are "trying one last hail mary to spend their way out of certain defeat."
What’s next
Watch whether more "solid Republican" seats draw new outside money in October FEC and AdImpact data, and how Democrats allocate their smaller reservation pool in the final five weeks.
More context
Where the money is going: Conservative super PACs dumped $1.5 million this month into Rep. Bryan Steil's Wisconsin district — rated "lean Republican" by Cook Political Report — their first investment of the cycle there, Reuters said. In North Carolina's 3rd District, which Trump won by 14 points and Cook rates "solid Republican," Rep. Gregory Murphy received $131,107 from a conservative PAC in the past week, the first outside spending on his behalf this cycle, while Democrats have spent more than $326,000 trying to oust him since July. In a south Texas district Trump won by 18 points, Republican groups have pumped about $2 million into texts, mail, and digital ads since Sep 5 to help Rep. Monica De La Cruz; Cook moved her seat from "lean Republican" to "tossup" on Friday.
War chest: Republicans have reserved at least $888 million in advertising over the coming weeks, compared with at least $666 million for Democrats, according to AdImpact figures cited by Reuters. No Going Back PAC, fully funded by Trump's super PAC MAGA Inc., is leading the surge, FEC records show. Over the three weeks through Friday, Republican-leaning super PACs outspent Democrats nearly 2-to-1 — about $309.7 million since Labor Day versus $174.2 million helping Democrats, Reuters said.
Uncertainty: Internal polling is not public, and many named incumbents still lead. Advertising reservations are not the same as final spend. Cook ratings can move again before Election Day.
1 listed source
- Reuters (Dawn Kopecki, Nolan McCaskill), Sep 27, 2026: Republicans pour money into dozens of US House races previously considered 'safe'
References listed by US Brief; a source count is not a verification score.
Editorial sourcing notes
All spending figures, race counts, and quotes follow Reuters (Dawn Kopecki in New York and Nolan McCaskill in Washington), Sep 27, 2026. AdImpact reservation totals and FEC-based PAC comparisons are as reported by Reuters. Cook Political Report ratings for named districts are as cited by Reuters. Operatives quoted as "familiar with the party's thinking" are unnamed in the Reuters account except where named strategists are identified.
Like US Brief? You can support it with a tip.