Both Sides: Should the U.S. keep MOAB on the table for Iran?
President Trump told Newsmax he would not use nuclear weapons against Iran and said the "mother of all bombs" under discussion is conventional. CNN and CBS say the Pentagon has prepared strike options that could include the GBU-43/B MOAB; Trump also said Iran is negotiating and asked for a halt to attacks.
AI-assisted · US Brief desk · Sources listed below
What happened
In a Thursday Newsmax interview from the White House, President Trump said he would not use nuclear weapons against Iran — "We don't have to" — and stressed that the "mother of all bombs" under discussion is not nuclear. He said the U.S. may still strike a site he called Pickaxe Mountain, does not foresee ground troops, and expects the Iran war to end "very soon" because Tehran is negotiating and has asked for a halt to U.S. and Israeli attacks.
Why it matters
The remarks land as midterms approach and as oil and diesel markets stay tight. They also clarify whether nuclear weapons are on the table while leaving open a large conventional strike.
More context
How outlets framed it: Newsmax and Fox News highlighted Trump ruling out nukes and floating a conventional MOAB option. CNN and CBS led with Pentagon planning for possible GBU-43/B MOAB use against Iranian energy and nuclear sites if combat resumes, citing unnamed officials. Iran International and Reuters/Ynet stressed the no-nukes and no-ground-troops lines.
The case for keeping MOAB on the table: Supporters say a very large conventional bomb signals resolve without crossing the nuclear threshold, and Trump argues Iran would use a nuclear weapon "instantaneously" if it got one. Leaving options open, he said, is meant to make sure Iran never builds one.
The case against: CNN noted officials have questioned whether a surface-blast MOAB can destroy deeply buried nuclear facilities, unlike bunker-busters used before. Critics warn more strikes risk wider war and higher energy prices even if the weapon is non-nuclear. Trump himself tied an end to the war to falling oil and gas prices.
Where they split: whether another strike wave, including MOAB, is needed to finish the job, or whether talks Trump describes should freeze further bombing. What would change the story: a confirmed strike order, a verified Iran-U.S. halt agreement, or evidence MOAB was or was not moved for use.
Sources across the spectrum This story cites right-leaning and mainstream or left-leaning outlets. Every source is listed below.
6 listed sources
- Fox News live updates, Oct. 15, 2026
- CNN, Oct. 15, 2026
- CBS News, Oct. 15, 2026
- Iran International, Oct. 16, 2026
- Reuters via Ynet, Oct. 15, 2026
- Al Jazeera, Oct. 16, 2026
References listed by US Brief; a source count is not a verification score.
Editorial sourcing notes
Sourcing lean: Fox News (right-leaning live coverage) and CNN/CBS (mainstream) cover the same Newsmax interview and MOAB planning. No outlet says Trump has ordered a MOAB strike. Hero photo is a 2003 DoD test image, not from any current operation.
Like US Brief? You can support it with a tip.